There's a story every growth marketer knows: the brand that built everything on Facebook, crushed it for years, then watched helplessly as iOS 14 obliterated their tracking and performance plummeted. They built a castle on rented land, and the landlord changed the rules.
The Dependency Trap
Platform dependency creeps up slowly. You find a channel that works. You double down. You build processes, hire specialists, develop creative frameworks all optimized for that single platform. Success breeds concentration, and concentration breeds fragility.
The problem isn't using platforms—that's unavoidable. The problem is depending on them without recognizing the risk. When 80% of your revenue flows through a single channel you don't control, you're one algorithm change away from crisis.
The Diversification Paradox
Every marketer knows they should diversify, yet few do. Why? Because concentration is efficient. Spreading budget across multiple channels means climbing multiple learning curves, managing multiple creative approaches, building multiple measurement frameworks. In the short term, focus wins.
But the long term always arrives. iOS 14 arrived. TikTok bans arrive. Algorithm changes arrive. The companies that survive these disruptions are those that built optionality before they needed it, not after.
Building on Owned Ground
The antidote to platform dependency isn't just channel diversification—it's building assets you actually own. Email lists. First-party data. Brand recognition that survives platform changes. Direct relationships with customers that don't require a middleman's permission.
This doesn't mean abandoning platforms. It means using them strategically while building parallel infrastructure you control. Rent the platforms, own the relationship. That's the sustainable model for growth in an era of constant platform upheaval.
← Back to Insights